Some Google Advertisers Cutting Spending
From Market Watch -
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — A growing number of online advertisers are bidding a partial goodbye to Google Inc.
Frustrated by the soaring price of Internet-search advertising and diminishing returns from the ads they buy, mid-sized advertisers say they plan to reduce how much business they do with Google this year — in some cases, significantly.
Last year, for example, eBags.com co-founder Peter Cobb spent between $5 million and $8 million to peddle suitcases, handbags and other carrying cases online. Google got 75% of that amount.
But this year it will get “significantly less,” Cobb said. “The Google percentage has got to go down,” he said.
In many cases, the cost of an eBags.com ad placed on either Google’s own Web site or one of its affiliates now equals 45% of the price of the product it promotes. That’s crimping the company’s own profit margins and forcing it to look elsewhere to market its bags.
“We’re testing print ads right now,” said Cobb, whose company will spend up to $8 million on ads in 2007.
Cobb was among a half-dozen Google customers — all of whom spent between $4 million and $10 million on search ads in 2006 — who told MarketWatch they plan to spend less this year to have their ads placed alongside Google’s search results.
While losing a few million here or there may not be enough to impact Google’s business — which generated more than $7 billion in sales last year — those interviewed for this story say their sentiment is not unusual among Google advertisers of their size.
… read the rest of the article.
When I started to read through the article, I became concerned that it was going to make no mention of the web site owner’s responsibility to make a good attempt at actually converting the visitor to a customer. Right now it’s very easy to get a Google AdWords campaign running, and start driving quality traffic to a website. It is not, however, an easy task to convert visitors to new customers.
Don’t get me wrong. If high conversion rates were easily attainable, our clients would have no need for our web strategy services, so I’m thankful! It’s just very hard not to cringe when you read articles that quote people who are undoubtedly going to go out and try to find the next “untapped” source of cheap traffic, without addressing the underlying problem: the landing page or website.
Thankfully, the article concludes by mentioning a company who has in fact started focusing on conversions:
Changing tactics
Likewise, not all Google advertisers who’ve seen their costs surge are cutting spending.
Google’s expansive advertising network and its No. 1 Internet search engine still make it a necessary part of any online campaign. Saying goodbye to Google and its huge audience is a risky move for advertisers.
Yet even those who will spend at least as much money on Google this year as they did in 2006 say their decision has more to do with improvements they’ve made on their own, rather than any increased satisfaction with Google’s ad service.
Sackrowitz of Bare Necessities said he won’t cut Google spending, but only because his company has developed expertise in converting clicks into sales.
“We’re getting healthy enough returns, but it’s a testament to how we’ve done a better job of converting shoppers to buyers than our competition,” he said. “We’ll stay the course, but I wish (keyword) prices were lower.”
